Thursday, December 15, 2005

I don't even own Merck!

But even if I did, it in no way would have affected my decision today stating that it was not liable for the fact that a wholly owned subsidiary falsely reported income in an effort to jack up the stock price.

Okay, okay, they only reported false income because they were frankly idiots. They were not in fact smart enough to do it in order to make the stock price rise.

13 comments:

lea ann marie* said...

This has nothing to do with politics because frankly I don't really have a spark for that kind of stuff. I don't really even get it. I just thought I'd let you know that I'd never actually TAKE action on someone. Granted I would want do, but I wouldn't. How did you find my blog anyway? Interesting stuff isn't it? I'm young yet, what can I say? I've got some things to work out, but I'll live. Just thought I'd explain. Hey, I see you're from Penn. So is my aunt and uncle. That's neat. Hey good luck on that supreme court stuff....are you really gonna be the next supreme court judge? Why don't you just start your own show. You'd really be makin' some big bucks!

SamuelAlito said...

I don't remember how I found your blog. I find a lot of blogs. Not as interesting as finding senators to bribe, anyway.

best

Sam

Anonymous said...

You are hilarious.

lea ann marie* said...

Well, thats interesting I suppose. Why would you want to bribe senators? I don't understand? Then again like I said, politics and me just dont click...heh, i'm luck if i can name who was the president before cliton....to be honest...I don't think I can. I'm not that stupid I just don't really catch on to that stuff.

Anonymous said...

Lea Ann Marie

It was George Bush's daddy that was before Clinton. George Bush's daddy was a friend and business partner of Osama Bin Laden's daddy. It sure is strange. Osama Bin Ladens daddy was killed in Texas. Saudi Arabia and Texas both have oil so they were oil partners. Isn't it mysterious?

lea ann marie* said...

It sure is! Why are you anonymous...that's kind of mysterious, too...

Tom DeLay said...

Sammy, my boy. How's it hanging?

SamuelAlito said...

Tom!

Great to hear from you. Things are great. I'm trying to talk to a few people and see if I can sit in on a criminal trial in Texas before taking the bench.

Can you spell D-I-S-M-I-S-S-E-D!

ollie said...

Hey, now I've got it: "Don't De-lay, call you're senator today and tell him to confirm Alito!" I know that I used the word "him" for Senator because all "real" senators are "hims" anyway.

Alicia said...

Dear Samuel,

As an adoring devotee of Tom DeLay and a founding member of the "I Love Tom DeLay!" blog, I beseech and implore you to please, please do the right thing and get Tommi's ridiculous case dismissed!!! I bet that would really 'grease the way' into a slam-dunk nomination for you on the Supreme Court. You know the President believes in him!

I'll bet you'll have some adoring devotees of your own if you can manage that!

http://ilovetomdelay.com

rev. billy bob gisher ©2005 said...

talk about influence, you have barely been up 3 months and you have like a dozen links to personal journals for depressed teenage females, your average post would fit on one of limbaugh's pill bottles, and your blog is worth 23,146.14? I want a job with bush. jeez. envy? you bet.

ollie said...

Sir, I have a bone to pick with you.

So far, while battles have raged over whether or not the BEST PRESIDENT THAT WE HAVE EVER HAD has legal authority to wiretap US Citizens in an effort to protect us from bad people, you have discussed things like stock and the shooting of runners.

Where it is all well to give cops the authority to shoot troublemakers (or potential troublemakers), what about a little help here?

Even our beloved Harriet would find space between her "OMG's" and "pro-eyeliner" posts to back up Mr. Brilliant on this, even if it were to say "if this great President of ours thinks it is legal and necessary, that would be good enough for me as a justice" or something to that effect.

stonesoup said...

Really....why the silence Judge?